Archive for April, 2009

Ligon Duncan on Covenant Theology

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , on April 23, 2009 by Harry

What is Covenant Theology?
J. Ligon Duncan

Covenant theology is the Gospel set in the context of God’s eternal plan of communion with his people, and its historical outworking in the covenants of works and grace (as well as in the various progressive stages of the covenant of grace).  Covenant theology explains the meaning of the death of Christ in light of the fullness of the biblical teaching on the divine covenants, undergirds our understanding of the nature and use of the sacraments, and provides the fullest possible explanation of the grounds of our assurance.

To put it another way, Covenant theology is the Bible’s way of explaining and deepening our understanding of: (1) the atonement [the meaning of the death of Christ]; (2) assurance [the basis of our confidence of communion with God and enjoyment of his promises]; (3) the sacraments [signs and seals of God’s covenant promises — what they are and how they work]; and (4) the continuity of redemptive history [the unified plan of God’s salvation]. Covenant theology is also an hermeneutic, an approach to understanding the Scripture — an approach that attempts to biblically explain the unity of biblical revelation.

Read more »

J.I. Packer on Covenant Theology

Posted in * Favorites with tags , on April 23, 2009 by Harry

INTRODUCTION: ON COVENANT THEOLOGY

J. I. Packer



I

The name of Herman Wits (Witsius, 1636-1 708) has been unjustly forgotten. He was a masterful Dutch Reformed theologian, learned, wise, mighty in the Scriptures, practical and “experimental” (to use the Puritan label for that which furthers heart-religion). On paper he was calm, judicious, systematic, clear and free from personal oddities and animosities. He was a man whose work stands comparison for substance and thrust with that of his younger British contemporary John Owen, and this writer, for one, knows no praise higher than that! To Witsius it was given, in the treatise here reprinted, to integrate and adjudicate explorations of covenant theology carried out by a long line of theological giants stretching back over more than century and a half to the earliest days of the Reformation. On this major matter Witsius’s work has landmark status as summing up a whole era, which is why it is appropriate to reprint it today. However, in modern Christendom covenant theology has been unjustly forgotten, just as Witsius himself has, and it will not therefore be amiss to spend a little time reintroducing it, in order to prepare readers’ minds for what is to come.

Read more »

J.I. Packer on the Law and Antinomianism

Posted in Law with tags on April 23, 2009 by Harry

Once a person is saved, he no longer needs concern himself with the law. Since he has been forgiven and justified, he no longer needs worry about sin — right? Orthodox Christianity has always replied, “wrong!” But why is that? If we are indeed freed from the law, what part does obedience play in our lives?

Many have found it hard to see what claim the law can have on the Christian. We are free from the law, they say; our salvation does not depend on law-keeping; we are justified through the blood and righteousness of Jesus Christ. How, then, can it matter, or make any difference to anything, whether we keep the law henceforth or not? And since justification means the pardon of all sin, past, present and future, and complete acceptance for all eternity, why should we be concerned whether we sin or not? Why should we think God is concerned? Does it not show an imperfect grasp of justification when a Christian makes an issue of his daily sins, and spends time mourning over them and seeking forgiveness for them? Is not a refusal to look to the law for instruction, or to be concerned about one’s daily shortcomings, part of the true boldness of justifying faith?

The Puritans had to face these “antinomian” ideas, and sometimes made heavy weather of answering them. If one allows it to be assumed that justification is the be-all and end-all of the gift of salvation, one will always make heavy weather of answering such arguments. The truth is that these ideas must be answered in terms not of justification but of adoption—a reality which the Puritans never highlighted quite enough*. Once the distinction is drawn between these two elements in the gift of salvation, the correct reply becomes plain.

What is that reply? It is this: that, while it is certainly true that justification frees one forever from the need to keep the law, or try to, as means of earning life, it is equally true that adoption lays on one the abiding obligation to keep the law, as the means of pleasing one’s newfound father. Law-keeping is the family likeness of God’s children; Jesus fulfilled all righteousness, and God calls us to do likewise. Adoption puts law-keeping on a new footing: as children of God, we acknowledge the law’s authority as a rule for our lives, because we know that this is what our Father wants. If we sin, we confess our fault and ask our Father’s forgiveness on the basis of the family relationship, as Jesus taught us to do—“Father . . . forgive us our sins” (Lk 11:2, 4). The sins of God’s children do not destroy their justification or nullify their adoption, but they mar the children’s fellowship with their Father. “Be holy, for I am holy” is our Father’s word to us, and it is no part of justifying faith to lose sight of the fact that God, the King, wants his royal children to live lives worthy of their paternity and position.

—J. I. Packer, Knowing God (InterVarsity Press, 1993), 222–223

R.C. Sproul on Salvation, Justification, Works, Antinomianism

Posted in Salvation, Video, Works with tags , on April 23, 2009 by Harry

Trusting God through trials

Posted in * Favorites, Sovereignty - God's, Trials and Suffering, Trust on April 22, 2009 by Harry
  • From Renewing Your Mind with Dr. R.C. Sproul Regional Conference Q and A 2008
  • God is sovereign over trials and sufferings

How did Adam incline his heart to evil?

Posted in Evil, Sin on April 22, 2009 by Harry
  • From Renewing your mind with Dr. R.C. Sproul Regional Conference Q and A 2008
  • correlative post by John Piper

R.C. Sproul – Did God ordain the Fall?

Posted in Evil, Sovereignty - God's on April 21, 2009 by Harry
  • From Renewing your mind with Dr. R.C. Sproul Regional Conference Q and A 2008
  • “God ordains everything that comes to past and if you deny this – you are not just not a Calvinist, you are not a theist, because if God has not ordained everything that has come to pass then He is not sovereign and if He is not sovereign and then He is not God.”

God’s Sovereignty and Grace

Posted in Grace, Sovereignty - God's on April 20, 2009 by Harry
  • From Renewing your mind with Dr. R.C. Sproul Regional Conference Q and A 2008
  • God’s grace is distributed according to His sovereignty
  • Man in has fallen condition does have the power to make choices, however, humans do not have an indifferent will – the bible says our wills are in bondage to sin

Was the Trinity ruptured on the cross?

Posted in Uncategorized with tags on April 19, 2009 by Harry
  • From Renewing Your Mind with Dr. R.C. Sproul Regional Conference Q and A 2008
  • R.C. Sproul states that the Trinity was not ruptured due to the immutability of God
    • Divine nature of Jesus was separated from the human nature of Jesus

In all things God works for the good of those who love Him

Posted in Sin, Sovereignty - God's on April 19, 2009 by Harry
  • From Renewing your mind with Dr. R.C. Sproul Regional Conference Q and A 2008
  • Romans 8:28  “And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose.”

4 Fundamental Laws of Logic

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , on April 19, 2009 by Harry
  • The Law of Identity
    • When you have identified something as “A” you are not talking about “non-A”
  • The Law of Noncontradiction
    • It is not possible that something be both true and not true at the same time and in the same context.
    • “B” is not “non-B”
    • Example: A table can not be both made entirely of wood and not made entirely of wood
    • Possible non-example: Light (l) is both a particle (P) and a wave (W).
      • It makes sense to then say that (for all l) not (l is P and l is not P) and this statement is true because light is both a particle and not a particle.
  • The Law of the excluded middle
    • Just because two things have one thing in common does not mean they have everything in common
    • something is either “B” or “non-B”
  • The Law of Rational Inference
    • The law of rational inference may be easily understood in this syllogism:
      • Major premise: all men are mortal.
      • Minor premise: Socrates is a man.
      • Conclusion: Socrates is mortal.

Read more »

Ravi Zacharias on abortion

Posted in Uncategorized with tags on April 15, 2009 by Harry
  • From October Q & A part 4

Sproul on Antinomianism

Posted in Law with tags on April 14, 2009 by Harry

Antinomianism , or lawlessness, in theology, is the idea that members of a particular religious group are under no obligation to obey the laws of ethics or morality as presented by religious authorities.  Antinomianism is the polar opposite of legalism, the notion that obedience to a code of religious law is necessary for salvation.

Is Jesus your lord? – R.C. Sproul talks about antinomianism.  This is an excerpt from R.C. Sproul’s audio teaching on the book of Romans:

I would say that one of the greatest problems that we have in evangelical Christianity today is the pervasive influence of what we call antinomianism, the spirit of antinomianism that says, “I am saved by faith.  I am justified by faith.  I am saved by grace.  Therefore I never have to be concerned in the slightest about obeying the law, or of doing righteousness, that the pursuit of righteousness is something Pharisees do because they are legalists and they seek to be justified by their works.  But we’re delivered from that by Christ.  We’re free from the law.  We’re free from requirements like that.  We don’t have to worry about obedience.”

That’s antinomianism.  That says that the law of God, the mandates of God, the commandments of God have no real binding influence on my conscience.  That is not just a distortion of Christianity, dear friends, that is a fundamental denial of Christianity.  And if a person really believes that, he can’t be justified; he can’t even be a Christian.  And yet the notion is all over the place in Christian circles.
Read more »

Spurgeon Morning and Evening – April 6th a.m.

Posted in * Favorites, Discipleship, Sanctification, Worldly Pursuits with tags on April 6, 2009 by Harry
  • We must not conform to this world

APRIL 6 MORNING
THEREFORE LET US GO TO HIM OUTSIDE THE CAMP. – HEBREWS 1 3 : 1 3
Jesus, bearing His cross, went to suffer outside the gate. The Christian’s reason for leaving the camp of the world’s sin and religion is not because he loves to be isolated, but because Jesus did so; and the disciple must follow his Master. Christ was “not of the world.” His life and His testimony were a constant protest against conformity with the world. Although He displayed overflowing affection for men, He was still separate from sinners. In the same way Christ’s people must “go to him.” They must take their position “outside the camp,” as witness-bearers for the truth. They must be prepared to walk the straight and narrow path. They must have bold, unflinching, lion-like hearts, loving Christ first, and His truth next, and Christ and His truth more than all the world. Jesus desires His people to “go … outside the camp” for their own sanctification. You cannot grow in grace to any high degree while you are conformed to the world. The life of separation may be a path of sorrow, but it is the highway of safety; and though the separated life may be painful and make every day a battle, yet it is a happy life after all. No joy can excel that of the soldier of Christ: Jesus reveals Himself so graciously and gives such sweet refreshment that the warrior feels more calm and peace in his daily strife than others in their hours of rest. The highway of holiness is the highway of communion. It is in this way we shall hope to win the crown if we are enabled by divine grace faithfully to follow Christ “outside the camp.” The crown of glory will follow the cross of separation. A moment’s shame will be well rewarded by eternal honor; a little while of witness-bearing will seem nothing when we are forever with the Lord.

Memorizing the 10 commandments

Posted in Uncategorized with tags on April 5, 2009 by Harry
  • Jim Mclarty presents an easy way of memorizing the 10 commandments
  • Thanks to Phil from www.reformedvoices.com

Atonement, Expiation, Propitiation

Posted in Sin with tags on April 5, 2009 by Harry

Expiation – the removal of sin
Propitiation – the appeasement of wrath

“Make atonement” can encompass both terms

TFL: The Crucifixion

Posted in Cross with tags on April 3, 2009 by Harry
  • Alistair takes an opposite position than the movie “The Passion of the Christ” in that he says that stressing the physicality of the event stirs emotion and sympathy, but it says nothing of the purpose of the event – that Jesus suffered these things for the atonement of our sins.
  • People leave the theatres and are moved that an innocent man was so brutally tortured, but yet their hearts are not changed
  • He also states that some of Jesus’s dialogue is from the Apocrypha
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.