Archive for the Israel Category

The Centrality of the Passover

Posted in Israel, Numbers with tags on June 8, 2010 by Harry

NUMBERS 9:1-14 “If anyone who is clean and is not on a journey fails to keep the Passover, that person shall be cut off from his people because he did not bring the LORD’S offering at its appointed time” (v- 13).

When we talk about the old covenant Passover, we make a distinction between the Passover as first celebrated and the codified, permanent way it was later commemorated. That is to say, while some traditions established in the first Passover meal continued on, not every element given in Exodus 12:1-32 was performed year after year. For example, the Israelites did not spread blood on their doorposts once they dwelt in the Promised Land. Instead, they looked to the instructions given in passages such as Leviticus 23:4-8, Numbers 9:1-14, and Deuteronomy 16:1-8 to show them how to keep the feast once they settled in Canaan.
Numbers 9:1-14 establishes the importance of Passover in the life of the people of God. There was to be no Israelite who failed to keep the feast each year, for even the unclean or those travelling on a long journey were required to observe Passover, although their particular circumstances meant that they were allowed to do so the following month. The important part of all this is, of course, the requirement that no covenant member could get away with neglecting the feast that commemorated Israel’s redemption from Egypt. Anyone who did not keep the Passover would be cut off from the people (v. 13) — they would be excluded from the nation. They were risking their lives, as those who were cut off faced the possibility that the Lord might strike them dead (Gen. 9:11). There is probably a hint of eternal judgment in this phrase as well. Paul is probably alluding to this warning of being cut off when he cautions today’s believers against unworthily partaking of the Lord’s Supper, which is a new covenant expression of Passover (1 Con 11:27-32). Professing new covenant believers who fail to partake of the body and blood of Christ Jesus in faith risk God’s discipline. Moreover, the command not to miss the Passover in Numbers 9:13 likely should be taken as a caution for us today not to miss the sacrament when it is offered.
Once Israel was established in the Holy Land, Passover was celebrated each year in Jerusalem, the whole nation making pilgrimage there to keep the feast and recall God’s salvation (Dent. 16:1-2). Later generations of Israel would sing the hallel (Pss. 113-18) on their way to Jerusalem for the seder, or Passover meal. The final Passover Lamb Himself sang these psalms just before His own sacrifice (Matt. 26:30). +

The importance of the Passover to the life of the old covenant people of God should clue us in on the centrality of the new covenant sacraments to the Christian life. These ordinances are not to be neglected but are to be attended when they are celebrated, for in them we have special remembrances of our salvation, and through them the Father strengthens our faith, union with Christ, and our unity with one another.

God’s Son is Called

Posted in * Favorites, Israel, Matthew, OT Messianic Prophecies on March 11, 2010 by Harry

Matthew 2:13-15 “This was to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by
the prophet, ‘Out of Egypt I called my son”‘ (v. 15b).

Despite Egypt’s antagonism toward Israel (Ex. 1:1-2:10), God’s rescue of His
people from captivity and His destruction of the pharaoh’s army (chap. 14) was never intended to be His last word regarding the Egyptian people. The Lord actually saved the Israelites in order to make them a light to the nations (Isa. 49:1-6), a witness to the glory and holiness of God as a nation of priests and servants (Ex. 19:1-6). This call was given so that people of every ethnicity would trust in Yahweh, even people from Egypt (Pss. 68:29; 82:8: Isa. 19:16-25).
Nothing less than the very salvation of the whole world was the purpose for Israel’s call. Called out of Egypt, Israel was to be the agent of Egypt’s redemption. Yet as is well known, the nation of Israel as a whole did not fulfill its call. True, the Spirit used the faith of individual Israelites like Naomi and the two spies sent to Jericho to call individual Gentiles like Ruth and Rahab to faith (Josh. 2; Ruth 1). Nevertheless, the people as a whole failed in their vocation and went after the pagan gods worshiped in the nations around them (Jer.16:14-21).
God could have abandoned His plan to make Israel, the people He called out of Egypt, a light to the nations due to its failure to bear witness to the Gentiles. Yet that is not what He did, as revealed in today’s passage. Matthew 2:13-I5 describes Jesus’ descent into Egypt and return to Galilee as a fulfillment of a prophecy first given in Hosea 11:1. In its original context, this prophecy in Hosea is about the Lord’s initial call of Israel (His son) out of Egypt during the exodus to be His light to the world. Since Israel failed to be this light, God sent His Son to succeed where His people failed. He would be the new Israel who would obey His Father’s will without hesitation and, as the light of the world (John 8:12), bring men and women from every background into saving fellowship with the one, true God. Christ Jesus, the true Israel, would incorporate into His body men and women to share His vocation as the light of the world to draw the nations to Himself (Matt. 5:14).
The Lord redeemed the Israelites from Egypt to save Egypt and, indeed, the entire world. When they failed, He sent His only Son, the faithful one, and brought Him out of Egypt to redeem Egypt, Assyria, and the world (Isa. 19:16-24; John 3:16).

All of us who were once in sin were in slavery even if we had no earthly masters. Wickedness held sway over our every thought, decision, and action, but in Christ we have been rescued from this power and are now enabled to live before God’s face in a manner that pleases Him. Christ went into Egypt and was brought out to begin the work that redeemed us from sin, and we should pursue holiness in gratitude for this awesome grace.

Deuteronomy 30:6

Posted in Deuteronomy, Israel, Regeneration on July 6, 2009 by Harry

Hebrew Scripture6 And the Lord your God will circumcise your heart and the heart of your offspring, so that you will love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul, that you may live.

New Bible Commentary:

  • The new element is that the Lord is seen here taking a decisive new part in their fortunes.
  • It will be by his power that they will be restored to their land.
    • (This is the meaning, in effect, of the phrase restore your fortunes; v 3, see also Je. 29:14; 30:3.)
  • Not only this, however, but he will create in them a new ability to be faithful.
    • This is implied by the phrase: The LORD your God mill circumcise your hearts (6); the same figure of speech in 10:16 had simply been an exhortation.
    • In some mysterious way the Lord will renew the relationship to make his people faithful (though their own need to repent is not bypassed; v 2). This is without lessening the need for their real obedience-, they are still responsible for their life with him.
    • The point may be understood in the light of the NT teaching about the role of the Holy Spirit in enabling Christians to overcome their sinful nature (Rom. 8:9-27; Gal. i:16-25).

Matthew Henry’s Concise Commentary:

  • 30:1-10 In this chapter is a plain intimation of the mercy God has in store for Israel in the latter days.
  • This passage refers to the prophetic warnings of the last two chapters, which have been mainly fulfilled in the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans, and in their dispersion to the present day; and there can be no doubt that the prophetic promise contained in these verses yet remain to come to pass.
  • The Jewish nation shall in some future period, perhaps not very distant, be converted to the faith of Christ; and, many think, again settled in the land of Canaan.
  • The language here used is in a great measure absolute promises; not merely a conditional engagement, but declaring an event assuredly to take place.
  • For the Lord himself here engages to circumcise their hearts; and when regenerating grace has removed corrupt nature, and Divine love has supplanted the love of sin, they certainly will reflect, repent, return to God, and obey him; and he will rejoice in doing them good.
  • The change that will be wrought upon them will not be only outward, or consisting in mere opinions; it will reach to their souls.
    • It will produce in them an utter hatred of all sin, and a fervent love to God, as their reconciled God in Christ Jesus; they will love him with all their hearts, and with all their soul.
  • They are very far from this state of mind at present, but so were the murderers of the Lord Jesus, on the day of Pentecost; who yet in one hour were converted unto God.
  • So shall it be in the day of God’s power; a nation shall be born in a day; the Lord will hasten it in his time.
  • As a conditional promise this passage belongs to all persons and all people, not to Israel only; it assures us that the greatest sinners, if they repent and are converted, shall have their sins pardoned, and be restored to God’s favor.

Deuteronomy Intro from the New Bible Commentary

Posted in Israel, Old Testament with tags on May 30, 2009 by Harry

Hebrew Scripture

The theology of Deuteronomy has relevance to modern Christians, but it must be read carefully, and in the light of the coming of Jesus Christ. Christians see themselves as the chosen people of God (1 Pet. 2:9), though in a quite different way from ancient Israel. They are not a political nation, living among other nations, nor do they need a land of their own, criminal laws, or their own leaders for times of peace and war. No more do they look for a single place of worship on earth in which God is more present than in other places. The period in God’s dealings with human beings in the world when these things were important is past. Since Jesus came, God’s people is international, living under different political systems, and actively seeking to extend God’s kingdom in all the world. And, of course, it is no longer making sacrifices to atone for sin.

Yet the main lines of the theology of Deuteronomy remain relevant. The book teaches about the grace of God in making us his own, as well as about the need for us to respond to him in a wholehearted way, in love and obedience. For us too God has been made known, though now in Christ, who is himself the ‘Place’ where we meet him. Our covenant is a new covenant in Christ, in which, though as morally weak as ever Israel was, we are enabled to remain faithful. And the blessings of God are no longer thought of in terms of material prosperity, but apply both to this age and the age to come.
Read more »

Deuteronomy 17:2-8

Posted in Deuteronomy, Israel, Old Testament with tags , on May 15, 2009 by Harry

2 “If there is found among you, within any of your towns that the Lord your God is giving you, a man or woman who does what is evil in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing his covenant, 3 and has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, or the sun or the moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have forbidden, 4 and it is told you and you hear of it, then you shall inquire diligently, and if it is true and certain that such an abomination has been done in Israel, 5 then you shall bring out to your gates that man or woman who has done this evil thing, and you shall stone that man or woman to death with stones. 6 On the evidence of two witnesses or of three witnesses the one who is to die shall be put to death; a person shall not be put to death on the evidence of one witness. 7 The hand of the witnesses shall be first against him to put him to death, and afterward the hand of all the people. So you shall purge the evil from your midst.

Matthew Henry's Commentary

From Matthew Henry’s Commentary:

  • Be it (worshipping of false gods) ever so indusriously concealed, he(God) sees it, and be it ever so ingeniously palliated, he (God) hates it: it is a sin in itself exceedingly heinous, and the highest affront that can be offered to Almighty God.
  • That it is a transgression of the covenant.
  • It was on this condition that God took them to be his peculiar people, that the should serve and worship him only as their God, so that if they gave to any other the honor which was due to him alone that covenant was void, and all the benefit of it forfeited.
  • Other sins were  transgressions of the command, but this was a transgression of the covenant.
  • It was spiritual adultery, which breaks the marriage bond.

The Tribes of Israel

Posted in Israel on March 31, 2009 by Harry

Tribes of Israel

  • From the Reformed Study Bible

Age of the Gentiles, Israel – Romans 11:28

Posted in Israel on March 29, 2009 by Harry

28 As regards the gospel, they are enemies of God for your sake. But as regards election, they are o beloved for the sake of their forefathers. 29 For the gifts and p the calling of God are irrevocable. 30 For just as q you were at one time disobedient to God but now have received mercy because of their disobedience, 31 so they too have now been disobedient in order that by the mercy shown to you they also may now [5] receive mercy. 32 For God r has consigned all to disobedience, that he may have mercy on all.

ESV Study Bible notes:

  • The unbelief of Israel has benefited the Gentiles, i.e., this is the period of history in which Gentiles are being saved, while most of Israel remains in unbelief.

    • But God’s electing promise given to their forefathers Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob will be fulfilled in the future.
  • Salvation history is structured to feature God’s great mercy.
    • God saved the Gentiles when one would expect only the Jews to be saved, but in the future he will amaze all by his grace again by saving the Jews, so that it will be clear that everyone’s salvation is by mercy alone.
    • The final now in the text does not mean the promise to the Jews is now fulfilled but that the promise of Jewish salvation could be fulfilled at any time.
  • Rom. 11:32 The word all here refers to Jews and Gentiles (all without distinction, not all without exception).
  • The sin and disobedience of both Jews and Gentiles is highlighted, to emphasize God’s mercy in saving some among both Jews and Gentiles.

God’s Promise to Abraham 2

Posted in God's Plan, Israel with tags , on March 15, 2009 by Harry

From Michael Williams As Far As the Curse is Found

Seed, Land and Blessing

God’s promises to Abraham in Geneesis 12:1-3 include four elements (three promises and a purpose statement)
seed or offspring
land, namely, the land of Canaan (more explicit in Gen. 12:7)
Israel will be blessed
Israel will be a blessing to all nations
These four elements reappear as God repeats the promises of the covenant to the patriarchs: again to Abraham (Gen. 22:17-18), to Isaac (Gen. 26:3-4), and to Jacob (Gen. 28:13-15).

Read more »

God’s Promise to Abraham

Posted in God's Plan, Israel on March 15, 2009 by Harry

From “As Far As the Curse is Found” by Michael Williams pgs 108-109

THE CALL OF ABRAHAM

The Missional Purpose of God’s Covenant with Abraham

  • Even though the word covenant (Hebrew: berith) does not appear in connection with Abraham until Genesis 15:18, God’s call in Genesis 12:1-3 expresses the heart of the Abrahamic covenant.
    • The LORD had said to Abram, “Leave your country, your people and your father’s household and go to the land I will show you
    • I will make you into a great nation and I will bless you;
    • I will make your name great, and you will be a blessing.
    • I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you.”

Read more »

People of God

Posted in Israel with tags on March 9, 2009 by Harry
  • From “As Far As the Curse is Found” – pg 251:
    • “Thus, the people of God are those in both the Old and New Testament era who responded to God by faith, and whose spiritual origin rests exclusively in God’s grace.”

Jews and Israel at end of times

Posted in Israel with tags on March 8, 2009 by Harry

From RC Sproul’s website:
What does Scripture teach us about the future role of Israel?

Some Christians believe that the New Testament church replaces Old Testament Israel as the subject matter of Old Testament prophecies about Israel. That is to say that the church today is regarded as the new Israel. If this is so, then any prophecies in the Bible having to do with Israel now refer to the Christian church and have no specific reference to the nation of Israel.

Read more »

Temple, Jerusalem, and Israel Overview *****

Posted in Giving, Israel on May 8, 2008 by Harry


Patriarchs to Roman Empire – Overview:

2000 BC

  • Abraham and Sarah have Isaac

Isaac and Rebekah have Jacob (Israel) and Esau (older son)

  • Jacob although younger became the child of the patriarchal promises

Jacob

  • Jacob had twelve sons by his two wives Leah, Rachel and two concubines Bilhah, Zilpah, and thus sired the twelve Tribes of Israel. His sons were Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Issachar, Zebulun, Dan, Naphtali, Gad, Asher, Joseph, and Benjamin
  • His favorite son, Joseph was betrayed by his brothers, sold into slavery and taken into Egypt

While in Egypt, Joseph was blessed by God and miraculously rose to high political office in the foreign land

  • During a sever drought, the sons of Israel traveled to Egypt in search of food for the family back in Canaan
  • Much to their surprise they were confronted by the very brother they had betrayed, and now their lives were in his hands
  • But Joseph provided food for them and saved their lives
  • Israel and all his children moved from Canaan to Goshen in the northeastern delta of Egypt
  • The Hyksos rule of Egypt may well have been the time when the children of Israel lived in Egypt and multiplied so rapidly
  • But once the Hyksos were expelled, “a new king arose over Egypt, who did not know about Joseph”

For the next several hundred years, the Israelites were enslaved by the Egyptians, and forced to build their cities and drive their economy

1446 or 1275 – Exodus

  • Moses leads the Israelites out of Egypt to the Sinai peninsula where he died

Joshua led the Israelites into Canaan circa 1000 BC

Israel became a loose confederation of 12 tribes and ruled on and ad-hoc basis by “judges”

  • They longed for a leader

Samuel was a prophet and judge who led Israel in the time of transition from judges to kings

  • With God’s blessing Samuel anointed Saul as the first king of Israel
  • But Saul failed to maintain his relationship with god and was eventually rejected as king

After Saul’s failure, God instructed Samuel to anoint a man after God’s own heart, David

  • Under David’s strong leadership, Israel finally defeated the Philistines and forged a degree of peace and security (Israel’s golden age)
  • Though there continued to be much internal strife during his reign, he was able to leave a unified kingdom to his son, Solomon

Solomon expanded Israel’s borders in close to what may be called an empire

  • He brought great wealth and prosperity to Israel
  • Solomon constructed the first temple
  • Solomon, like Saul before him, allowed his hear to turn away from God

Shortly after the death of Solomon, Israel split into two weaker nations, Israel in the north and Judah in the south

  • Assyrians were starting to rise to power, but as Assyria went through a period of internal weakness and 750-700 BC and the Israel and Judah remained prosperous
  • However, social injustice and moral decay began to consume the soul of Israel and Judah
  • Backdrop for prophets: Amos, Hosea, Isaiah, and Micah

Northern Israel fell quickly into religious apostasy and political unrest, In 722 BC the capital of northern Israel, Samaria, fell to the Assyrians

Judah, the southern kingdom by contrast maintained one ruling family (the Davidic dynasty) until 587 BC when Jerusalem, Judah’s capital fell to the Babylonians

The Neo-Assyrian Empire was a period of Mesopotamian history which began in 934 BC and ended in 609 BC.

  • During this period, Assyria assumed a position as a great regional power, vying with Babylonian and other lesser powers for dominance of the region,
  • The Chaldeans of southern Babylon were growing ever more rebellious and difficult to contain for the Assyrians and they soon became independent and replaced the Assyrians
  • The Babylonians destroyed the temple in 587
  • Backdrop of the OT prophets Jeremiah, Habakkuk, and Ezekiel

Persians then ruled until Alexander the Great around 330 BC

Roman empire gained control around 100 BC

Jerusalem:
According to the biblical account, David’s first action as king of Israel was to conquer Jerusalem and declare it the capital of his kingdom.

  • Even though the city was not the perfect choice from many points of view, a geopolitical constraint dictated this choice.
  • Mount Moriah is an important place where Abraham bound Isaac and thus the Temple was to be built there.
  • David is said to have conquered Jerusalem in approximately 1004 BC and made it a center of his government.
  • He brought the Ark of the Covenant to the city.
  • Jerusalem became the political and spiritual nexus of the ancient Hebrews.
  • King David was instructed by God not to build the Temple, leaving the task to his son Solomon.
  • The concentration of religious ritual at the Temple made Jerusalem a place of pilgrimage and an important commercial center.

The city served as the capital of the united kingdom of Israel, but became the capital of the less powerful of the two kingdoms (Judah) after the death of Solomon and the division of the country into two kingdoms.

  • It regained its central status after the conquest and destruction of the northern Kingdom of Israel by the Assyrians in 722 BC.
  • In 586 BC the city was invaded by the Babylonians.
  • At the order of King Nebuchadnezzar II (a ruler of Babylon in the Chaldean Dynasty) the city was torched, the Temple was razed, and the people were taken into exile.
  • Jewish tradition holds this incident to be the first exile of the Jewish nation.

The Temple – Overview:

First temple: 957 BC – destroyed by the Babylonians in 586 BC

Second temple: 515 BC – destroyed by the Roman in 70 AD

  • All of the outer walls still stand, although the Temple itself has long since been destroyed, and for many years it was believed that the western wall of the complex was the only wall standing

Solomon’s Temple, also known as the First Temple, was, according to the Bible, the first temple of the ancient Hebrew religion in Jerusalem.

It functioned as a religious focal point for worship and the sacrifices known as the korbanot in ancient Judaism.

The First Temple was built by King Solomon in seven years during the 10th century BCE in 957 BC

Completed in the 10th century BC, it was destroyed by the Babylonians in 586 BC.

The reconstructed temple in Jerusalem, which stood between 516 BC and 70 AD, was the Second Temple.

The Temple is believed to have been situated upon the hill which forms the site of the present-day Temple Mount, in the center of which area is the Dome of the Rock.

  • Under the Jebusites the site was used as a threshing floor. 2 Sam. 24 describes its consecration during David’s reign.
  • Two other, slightly different sites for the Temple have also been proposed, on this same hill.
  • One places the stone altar at the location of the rock which is now beneath the gilded dome, with the rest of the temple to the west.
  • The Well of Souls was, in this theory, a pit for the remnants of the blood services of the korbanot.
  • The other theory places the Holy of Holies atop this rock.

Two different Jewish temples actually occupied this mountain at different times.

The first was proposed by King David but was not built until his son, Solomon gained the throne.

  • David made great preparation for the temple but, according to the Bible was not allowed to because of the wars he had fought.
  • This temple stood for a number of years until it was destroyed by the invading armies of Nebuchadnezzar when Jerusalem fell and was taken into exile as captives.
  • It was at this time that the Ark of the Covenant, which occupied the Holy of Holies (the inner sanctuary of the temple)was believed to have disappeared from history).

Roughly some 70 years later, under the leadership of Jewish leaders such as Ezra and Nehemiah and with the blessing of the Persian King Cyrus, the temple was again rebuilt and stood until the time of Jesus Christ, during the reign of King Herod.

  • Herod refurbished the temple, built my Ezra/Nehemiah, making it into a grandiose building far excelling its previous glory and splendor.
  • Unfortunately, this notoriety was short-lived, as the building was razed by the Romans, some 70 years later.
  • The so-called “Wailing Wall” in Jerusalem, is actually part of the original retaining wall built around the temple mount as a foundation for the original temple by King Solomon.
  • The Temple Mount in Jerusalem is the site where the First Temple of Solomon and the Second Temple were built.
  • At the center of the structure was the Holy of Holies where only the high priest could enter.
  • The Temple Mount is now the site of the Islamic mosque, the Dome of the Rock (690 AD).
  • The Dome of the Rock is located at the visual center of an ancient man-made platform known as the Temple Mount to the Jews and the Haram al-Sharif (Noble Sanctuary) to the Muslims.
  • The platform, greatly enlarged under the rule of Herod the Great, was the former site of the Second Jewish Temple which was destroyed during the Roman Siege of Jerusalem in 70 AD.
  • In 637 AD, Jerusalem was conquered by the Rashidun Caliphate army during the Islamic invasion of the Byzantine Empire.

When Macedonian ruler Alexander the Great conquered the Persian Empire, Jerusalem and Judea fell under Macedonian control, eventually falling to the Ptolemaic dynasty under Ptolemy

Israel Political History:

As Rome became stronger it installed Herod as a Jewish client king.

  • Herod the Great, as he was known, devoted himself to developing and beautifying the city.
  • He built walls, towers and palaces, and expanded the Temple Mount, buttressing the courtyard with blocks of stone weighing up to 100 tons.
  • Under Herod, the area of the Temple Mount doubled in size.
  • In 6 AD, the city, as well as much of the surrounding area, came under direct Roman rule as the Iudaea Province[41] and Herod’s descendants through Agrippa II remained client kings of Judea until 96 AD.
  • Roman rule over Jerusalem and the region began to be challenged with the first Jewish-Roman war, the Great Jewish Revolt, which resulted in the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 AD.
  • In 130 AD Hadrian Romanized the city, and renamed it Aelia Capitolina.

Jerusalem once again served as the capital of Judea during the three-year rebellion known as the Bar Kochba revolt.

  • Bar Kokhba revolt (132–135 AD) against the Roman Empire was a second major rebellion by the Jews of Iudaea and the last of the Jewish-Roman Wars.
  • Simon bar Kokhba, the commander of the revolt, was acclaimed the Messiah, the king prophesied to restore Israel.
  • The revolt established a Jewish state for over two years, but a massive Roman army finally crushed it.
  • The Romans then barred Jews from Jerusalem.
  • Jewish Christians hailed Jesus as the Messiah and did not support Bar Kokhba.
  • They were barred from Jerusalem along with the rest of the Jews.
  • The war and its aftermath helped differentiate Christianity as a religion distinct from Judaism.
  • According to Cassius Dio, 580,000 Jews were killed, 50 fortified towns and 985 villages razed.
  • The Talmud, however, claims a death toll in the millions.
  • The latter figure is unlikely, because there were simply not that many Jews in the region at that time.
  • Cassius Dio claimed that “Many Romans, moreover, perished in this war.
  • Therefore, Hadrian, in writing to the Senate did not employ the opening phrase commonly affected by the emperors: ‘If you and your children are in health, it is well; I and the army are in health.’” [1]

Hadrian attempted to root out Judaism, which he saw as the cause of continuous rebellions.

  • He prohibited the Torah law, the Hebrew calendar and executed Judaic scholars.
  • The sacred scroll was ceremoniously burned on the Temple Mount. At the former Temple sanctuary, he installed two statues, one of Jupiter, another of himself.
  • In an attempt to erase any memory of Judea, he wiped the name off the map and replaced it with Syria Palaestina, after the Philistines, the ancient enemies of the Jews; previously similar terms had been used to describe only the (smaller) former Philistine homeland to the west of Judea.
  • Since then, the land has been referred to as “Palestine,” which supplanted earlier terms such as “Iudaea” (Judaea) and the antiquated “Canaan.”
  • Similarly, he re-established Jerusalem as the Roman pagan polis of Aelia Capitolina, and Jews were forbidden from entering it.
  • Constantine I allowed Jews to mourn their defeat and humiliation once a year on Tisha B’Av at the Western Wall.
  • Jews remained scattered for close to two millennia; their numbers in the region fluctuated with time.
  • Modern historians have come to view the Bar-Kokhba Revolt as being of decisive historic importance.
  • The massive destruction and loss of life occasioned by the revolt has led some scholars to date the beginning of the Jewish diaspora from this date
  • the presence of Jews outside of the Land of Israel, is a result of the expulsion of the Jewish people out of their land, migrations from there, and religious conversion to Judaism
  • They note that, unlike the aftermath of the First Jewish-Roman War chronicled by Josephus, the majority of the Jewish population of Judea was either killed, exiled, or sold into slavery after the Bar-Kokhba Revolt, and Jewish religious and political authority was suppressed far more brutally
  • The Romans succeeded in recapturing the city in 135 AD and as a punitive measure Hadrian banned the Jews from entering it.
  • As a result the city became entirely pagan (non-Jewish).
  • Hadrian proceeded to rename the entire Iudaea Province to Syria Palaestina after the Biblical Philistines in an attempt to thwart future rebellion and to de-Judaize Judea
  • Enforcement of the ban on Jews entering Aelia Capitolina continued until the 4th century AD.

The terms Byzantine Empire (a historiographical term used since the 19th century) and Eastern Roman Empire are expressions used to describe the Eastern Roman Empire

  • During the 3rd century, three crises threatened the Roman Empire: external invasions, internal civil wars and an economy riddled with weaknesses and problems.
  • Constantine moved the seat of the Empire, and introduced important changes into its civil and religious constitution.
  • In 330, he founded Constantinople as a second Rome on the site of Byzantium
  • Under Constantine, Christianity did not become the exclusive religion of the state, but enjoyed imperial preference, since the Emperor supported it with generous privileges: clerics were exempted from personal services and taxation, Christians were preferred for administrative posts, and bishops were entrusted with judicial responsibilities
  • The Eastern Empire was largely spared the difficulties faced by the West in the third and fourth centuries, due in part to a more firmly established urban culture and greater financial resources, which allowed it to placate invaders with tribute and pay barbarian mercenaries.

Constantine instituted several legislative measures which had an impact on Jews.

  • They were forbidden to own Christian slaves or to circumcise their slaves
  • Conversion of Christians to Judaism was outlawed.
  • Congregations for religious services were restricted, but Jews were allowed to enter Jerusalem on Tisha B’Av, the anniversary of the destruction of the Temple.
  • In the five centuries following the Bar Kokhba revolt, the city remained under Roman then Byzantine rule
  • During the 4th century, the Roman Emperor Constantine I constructed Christian sites in Jerusalem such as the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.
  • Jerusalem reached a peak in size and population at the end of the Second Temple Period: The city covered two square kilometers (0.8 sq mi.) and had a population of 200,000
  • From the days of Constantine until the Arab conquest in 638, Jews were banned from Jerusalem,but were allowed back into the city by Muslim rulers.
  • By the end of the 7th century, an Umayyad caliph Abd al-Malik had commissioned and completed the construction of the Dome of the Rock over the Foundation Stone.
  • In the four hundred years that followed, Jerusalem’s prominence diminished as Arab powers in the region jockeyed for control.

In 1099, Jerusalem was besieged by the First Crusaders, who killed most of its Muslim and Jewish inhabitants, apart from many Christians.

  • The First Crusade was launched in 1095 by Pope Urban II with the dual goals of conquering the sacred city of Jerusalem and the Holy Land and freeing the Eastern Christians from Islamic rule.
  • What started as an appeal by Byzantine Emperor Alexius I Comnenus for western mercenaries to fight the Seljuk Turks in Anatolia quickly turned into a wholescale Western migration and conquest of territory outside of Europe.
  • That would be the first of several conquests to take place over the next four hundred years
  • In 1187, the city was taken from the Crusaders by Saladin.
  • Between 1228 and 1244, it was given by Saladin’s descendant al-Kamil to the Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II.
  • Jerusalem fell again in 1244 to the Khawarizmi Turks, who were later, in 1260, replaced by the Mamelukes.
  • In 1517, Jerusalem and its environs fell to the Ottoman Turks, who would maintain control of the city until the 20th century.
  • This era saw the first expansion outside the Old City walls, as new neighborhoods were established to relieve the overcrowding.
  • The first of these new neighborhoods included the Russian Compound and the Jewish Mishkenot Sha’ananim, both founded in 1860.

In 1917 after the Battle of Jerusalem, the British Army, led by General Edmund Allenby, captured the city.

  • The League of Nations, through its 1922 ratification of the Balfour Declaration, entrusted the United Kingdom to administer the Mandate for Palestine and help establish a Jewish state in the region.
  • The period of the Mandate saw the construction of new garden suburbs in the western and northern parts of the city and the establishment of institutions of higher learning such as the Hebrew University, founded in 1925

As the British Mandate for Palestine was expiring, the 1947 UN Partition Plan (Part III) recommended “the creation of a special international regime in the City of Jerusalem, constituting it as a corpus separatum under the administration of the United Nations.”

  • The international regime was to remain in force for a period of ten years, whereupon a referendum was to be held in which the residents of Jerusalem were to decide the future regime of the city. (Jerusalem had a Jewish majority both in 1948 and in 1958.)
  • However, this plan was not implemented as the Haganah and the Jordanian Arab Legion fought for control of the city.
  • On May 28, the Arab Legion gained control over the Old City; all of its Jewish inhabitants were either taken prisoner or handed over to the Red Cross to be permanently transferred to Israeli-controlled areas.
  • At the end of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, Jerusalem found itself divided between Israel and Jordan (then known as Transjordan).
  • The ceasefire line established through the Armistice Agreement of 1949 between Israel and Jordan, cut through the center of the city from 1949 until 1967, during which time West Jerusalem was part of Israel and East Jerusalem was part of Jordan.
  • In 1949, Israel designated West Jerusalem as its capital
  • Contrary to the terms of the Armistice Agreement of 1949 between Jordan and Israel, Israelis were denied access to Jewish holy sites, many of which were desecrated, and only allowed extremely limited access to Christian holy sites.

6 day war:

  • Following the 1967 Six-Day War Israel captured East Jerusalem, asserted sovereignty over the entire city, and later in 1980 declared Jerusalem, “complete and united”, to be the capital of Israel.
  • However, East Jerusalem has been seen by the Palestinian Arabs as a possible capital of a proposed Palestinian state.
  • They also refer to Security Council resolution 252, which considers invalid expropriation of land and other actions that tend to change the legal status of Jerusalem.[68] The status of the city and of its holy places remains disputed to this day.
  • In 1967, Egypt, Jordan, and Syria massed troops close to Israeli borders, expelled UN peacekeepers and blocked Israel’s access to the Red Sea.
  • Israel saw these actions as a casus belli for a pre-emptive strike that launched the Six-Day War, during which it captured the West Bank, Gaza Strip, Sinai Peninsula and Golan Heights.
  • The 1949 Green Line became the administrative boundary between Israel and the occupied territories. Jerusalem’s boundaries were enlarged, incorporating East Jerusalem.
  • The Jerusalem Law, passed in 1980, reaffirmed this measure and reignited international controversy over the status of Jerusalem.

In 1992, Yitzhak Rabin became Prime Minister following an election in which his party promoted compromise with Israel’s neighbors.

  • The following year, Shimon Peres and Mahmoud Abbas, on behalf of Israel and the PLO, signed the Oslo Accords, which gave the Palestinian National Authority the right to self-govern parts of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, in return for recognition of Israel’s right to exist and an end to terrorism.
  • In 1994, the Israel-Jordan Treaty of Peace was signed, making Jordan the second Arab country to normalize relations with Israel.
  • Public support for the Accords waned as Israel was struck by a wave of attacks from Palestinians.
  • The November 1995 assassination of Yitzhak Rabin by a far-right-wing Jew, as he left a peace rally, shocked the country.
  • At the end of the 1990s, Israel, under the leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu, withdrew from Hebron (main city of the west bank) and signed the Wye River Memorandum, giving greater control to the Palestinian National Authority.

Exodus Chronology

Posted in Israel, Old Testament on May 5, 2008 by Harry

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exodus

Years between the Temple and the Exodus:
There is little scholarly agreement as to even the century in which the Exodus should be placed[citation needed]. If one accepts a plain reading of 1 Kings 6:1, then the Exodus occurred 480 years before Solomon began to build the Temple in the 4th year of his reign; and he completed it seven years later (1 Kings 6:37-38). The consensus of most experts dates this dedication in the range of 960-970 BCE[citation needed]. The date derives from the end of his reign overlapping the beginning of the reign of the biblical Pharaoh Shishaq, who is then identified with the Pharaoh Sheshonq I (945–924). (The Biblical Minimalist school of interpretation challenge the historicity of Solomon and thereby the date of the Temple.) If Solomon (970-928) dedicated the Temple in year 966, we arrive at an Exodus date of approximately 1440 BC. Unfortunately this date remains unsatisfactory for several reasons:

Some perceive other biblical data to conflict with this 480 years between the Exodus and the Temple.

* In the era of the Judges, if one adds their reigns, they exceed 480 years, thus suggesting an earlier date for the Exodus. Alternatively, if judges are understood as leaders of various localities, who rule contemporaneously, the time may be less than 480 years[citation needed].
* Some understand the citation of 450 years by Paul in the New Testament (Acts 13:16-20), to refer to the period of the Judges. After adding the duration of the reigns of the kings Saul and David, a period of 580 years is given for the entire period from the exodus to the temple. This is supported by Josephus, who gave 592 years as the time between the Exodus and the Temple. However a plain reading of Acts 13:16-20 suggests that the figure of 450 years was intended to include the 400 years spent by the Israelites in Egypt prior to the Exodus, plus the 40 years wandering in the wilderness, plus the years it took to subdue the nations of Canaan. In that understanding, no reference is made to the duration of the period of the Judges.

The derivative date of around 1440 BCE for the Exodus seems to pinpoint a Pharaoh whose Egyptian records may not match the biblical description.

* 1446 falls in the reign of Thutmose III, whether his reign is dated according to earlier High Chronology or the later more-conventional Low Chronology. From archaeology, records about him do not mention him expelling Hyksos, Hebrews, Beduins, Asiatics, or any group that can be identified with Israel[citation needed]. Perhaps oppositely, he was said to capture Canaanite prisoners in battle to bring them to Egypt as slaves[citation needed]. Admittedly, the Pharaoh of the Exodus also chased the Israelites to try capture them as slaves.

An Exodus date of 1440 BC, followed by a 40-year Wandering, would result in a Conquest date of 1400 BC, which seems to match nothing in the archeology of Israel. There are many places with destruction layers dating to around 1200 BCE (and to around 1550 BCE), but little around 1400 BCE[citation needed].

* At Hazor, a destruction layer is at the transition from the Canaanite Bronze Age to the Israelite Iron Age, dating to around 1200 BCE ± 50 years. This date corresponds to the Merneptah Stele that mentions Israel in this area around year 1208. A similar layer at Lachish is dated to 1150, and at Megiddo to 1145 BCE. Other “Joshua” cities have transition layers around 1250 BCE. Even so, some “Joshua” cities don’t have destruction layers at all[4].
* If the 1200 BCE destruction layers evidence the activity of Israelites under Joshua, either the biblical figure of 480 years must be discounted, or Egyptian chronology must be radically revised, or biblical chronology must be radically revised. A number of scholars have attempted to revise Egyptian chronology[citation needed], but so far such revisions cause more problems than they solve.

Interpretation:
The findings of modern archaeologists may present a challenge for Orthodox Jews and fundamentalist Christians. The Exodus and the subsequent Conquest of Canaan that the chronologies of the archaeologists seem to plainly diverge from those that may be derived from known versions of the Bible, at least in overall terms of centuries and populations.

The strong negative reaction to leading Conservative Rabbi David Wolpe’s 2001 Passover speech, where he plainly stated that the Exodus did not happen, indicates that this is still a controversial issue even in the liberal Jewish movements.

We are at the boundary between verifiable history and the earlier, harder-to-verify histories of the Bible. Such reasoning is possible because the Israelite chronologies seem secure back through the time of Solomon, and those of Egypt much farther back. It would appear we have what may reasonably be described as proto-Israelite material culture transitions which can be dated with reasonable accuracy, and occur at unexpectedly late dates.[citation needed] Now, since only 40 years separate the Exodus and the Conquest in the biblical narrative, if we are talking about a Late Conquest, we are talking about a Late Exodus as well. Thus, conservative scholars[who?] within Judaism and Christianity by and large still attempt to maintain Biblical chronologies in keeping with I Ki. 6:1, rabbinical materials, or Josephus, i.e. early Exodus chronologies, whereas less literalist scholars within these traditions as well as most scholars outside of them by and large subscribe to Late Exodus chronologies.

Most archaeologists[who?] working on the territories of ancient Israel now support chronologies differing from the biblical Conquest of Canaan by some centuries, and if it turns out they are right, we may have to revise our historical view of the Exodus accordingly. In spite of what appears to be a discrepancy of archaeology with the Bible, the work of archaeologists does suggest the reality of the overall ‘sweep of events’ – e.g. an arrival in Canaan by this proto-Israelite material culture some centuries before the time that Solomon and David are believed to have lived, and Egypt had been known to enslave Semites.[8] Egyptologists have even discovered various Exodus-like events that could well correspond to events such as those that may have given rise to the biblical Exodus narratives.[citation needed] Although nothing has been found to substantiate the presence of Egypto-Israelites wandering in the Sinai so as to fix the date of the Exodus, neither has anything like a direct, unambiguous record of Joshua and his attacks ever been found.

Many rabbis in the Talmud[who?] stated that one should not always interpret certain Torah verses literally. Later rabbis, such as Maimonides, taught that when reality contradicts a current understanding of the Gemara, we must re-interpret that Gemara in accord with science.[citation needed] For many traditional rabbis,[who?] this did not apply to the Torah, and such a position would count as heresy.[citation needed] This view exists today within Conservative Judaism, Reform Judaism, and parts of Modern Orthodox Judaism.[citation needed]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.