Archive for the Uncategorized Category

Don Carson on Wickedness in the Psalms

Posted in Evil, Holiness of God, Psalms, Uncategorized with tags on April 27, 2010 by Harry

Among the insights the Psalms convey, some of the most penetrating deal with the nature of wickedness and of wicked people. Rarely are these put into abstract categories. They are almost always functional and relational.
What lies at the heart of the “sinfulness of the wicked”? “There is no fear of God before his eyes” (Ps. 36:1). This means something more than that the wicked person is foolishly unafraid of the punishment that God will finally mete out (though it does not mean less than that). It means that the wicked are so blind that they do not see the ultimate realities. They either do not see God at all, or, scarcely less horribly, they do not see God as he is.
All appropriate behavior and outlook for human beings made in the image of God find their reference point and measure in God himself. The fear of the Lord is the beginning of both knowledge (Prov. 1:7) and wisdom (Prov. 9:10), for “knowledge of the Holy One is understanding” (Prov. 9:10). The converse is utter folly: “fools despise wisdom and discipline” (Prov. 1:7). Small wonder the psalmist insists that it is the fool who says, “There is no God” (Ps. 14:1). Scarcely less foolish is the conjuring up of domesticated gods we can manage, or of savage gods that are brutal and immoral, or of impersonal gods that depersonalize God’s image-bearers. When one is blind to the true God, including his glorious holiness that must rightly instill fear in image-bearers as rebellious as we, there is no stopping place in our descent into the abyss of folly.
The blindness of the wicked extends to their assessment of themselves. “For in his own eyes he flatters himself too much to detect or hate his sin” (Ps. 36:2). If he could see well enough to detect his sin, to see it for what it is—rebellion against the living God—and hate it for its sheer vileness and utter arrogance before the majestic holiness of his Maker, inevitably he would also fear God. The twin blindnesses are one.
This, of course, is why philosophical debates about the existence of God can never be resolved by reason alone. It is not that God is unreasonable, still less that he has left himself without witness. Rather, the tragedy and ignominy of human sin leave us, apart from God’s grace, horribly blind. Yet this blindness is culpable blindness: the wicked have no fear of God before their eyes. Paul understands the point so well that he makes this the culminating proof-text in his proof of human lostness (Rom. 3:18). Thank God for the next thirteen verses the apostle pens.

  • Carson, D. A. (1998). For the love of God : A daily companion for discovering the riches of God’s Word. Volume 1. Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway Books.

Spirit of the Law vs. Letter of the Law

Posted in Uncategorized with tags on April 24, 2010 by Harry

1 SAMUEL 21:1-9 “The priest gave him the holy b read, for there was no bread there but the bread of the Presence, which is removed from before the LORD, to be replaced by hot bread on the day it is taken away”

Bread is an important symbol of life in Scripture (John 6:35), so it is not surprising to see the bread of the Presence, which was put before the life-giving Creator, reappear in several significant places in the Bible. Today’s passage is one such place, describing a time when David came to the tabernacle looking for something to eat and a weapon with which he could defend himself (1 Sam. 21:1-9).
At that point in his life, David was running from Saul, who was motivated to kill him out of a desire to protect his own throne (20:30-31). After realizing that Saul was out to get him, David fled to Nob to meet Ahimelech, the priest who was presiding over the tabernacle (21:1a). Ahimelech was afraid when he first saw David, and many commentators think he might have feared that the enemies of Israel would be right behind the future king, bringing destruction in their wake (v. 1b).
David lied to Ahimelech about his reason for coming to him, for Saul had most certainly not sent him out on a special mission (v. 2). Commentators speculate that David probably lied in order to protect Ahimelech from any charges of conspiracy if Saul were to later find out the priest had helped David. The future king might have reasoned that Ahimelech could not legitimately be prosecuted for treason if he did not know David was on an unapproved mission. Saul, however, was an unreasonable man and later slaughtered Ahimelech and all but one of his fellow priests at Nob (22:6-23).
In any case, David asked for food, and the only thing that was present at the tabernacle was the bread of the Presence, which was normally reserved only for the priests (21:3-4; see Lev. 24:5-9). There was nothing in the letter of the Law that allowed the bread to be given to anyone else, but Ahimelech knew the Law was given to further life and that the spirit of the Law demanded that feeding the needy must be put ahead of ritual if the two ever seem to conflict (Deut. 15:7-8).
Jesus later appealed to this incident to justify His practice of ignoring those Pharisaic traditions that put safeguarding religious ritual above helping the hungry (Mark 2:23-28). Following such traditions leads only to bondage to sin and not freedom according to the law of liberty that the Spirit enables us to obey (James 1:25).
The letter of the Law is not unimportant, but it can never be followed at the expense of the spirit of the Law. This can be difficult and is fraught with peril, for it can be easy to claim to follow the spirit of the Law only because we want to justify lawlessness. Only by the regular study of Scripture with other godly Christians and prayer can we know the spirit of the Law well enough so as to apply God’s commandments.

Faith is Way by Stuart McAllister

Posted in Uncategorized on April 11, 2010 by Harry

The history of Israelites is a powerful lesson of all that can happen on the spiritual journey. We see the glory of the great deliverance in the Exodus, the giving of the tabernacle and the Law in the wilderness. The people were formed by God and called to serve. They entered the land and conquered it in order to obtain the promise. But, as we know, all did not go well. They did not follow the Lord fully or faithfully. They formed alliances with the local people and steadily adopted foreign customs, ways, and worst of all, foreign gods. In the history of the people of Israel, we see the pendulum swing back and forth from faithfulness to rampant rejection of God.
The last verse of the book of Judges captures the situation and the mood of one stage in their history: “In those days Israel had no king-, everyone did as he saw fit” (21:25). In the midst of their oscillating responses of halfhearted faith and complete disobedience to God, Israel continued to face the up and down situation of peace and war. The lessons they were left with are still timely in their importance and lasting in their urgency: Casual religion has serious consequences. Religious hypocrisy is altogether deplorable.
Through the Israelites, we see the reflections of our own polished idols, veiled motives, and empty rituals. Author A.J. Conyers suggests the very real danger that “all religion, and every practice of religion, and in fact all of human life is in danger of being marshaled into the service of the human ego.” Within us is the tendency to center all thinking and concerns in the self, the propensity to give attention only to things that seem to offer immediate yield or gratification, and the inability to rest, relax, or be satisfied unless we are constantly stimulated or perpetually entertained. Elsewhere Conyers speaks of the ease with which, in the presence of a skewed image of our fallenness, our images of God Himself become skewed, “Rather than understanding God as the meaning in all things, he becomes the means by which we gain some things. Rather than a God to be worshiped, he becomes a god to be used.” What can we do to remain awake on the journey of belief?

Author Harry Blamires, in his book The Secular Heresy, hits the nail on the head. “We must not exploit our faith by advertising it as a technique for achieving earthly satisfactions. The faith is not a recipe and not a program. It is a Way. Recipes and programs are made to help you carry out earthly jobs successfully. But a Way is something you walk in.”

The entire story of the people of Israel and the whole of the New Testament run against the grain of lukewarm religion and casual spirituality. The writer of Hebrews encourages our total attention to what has been set before us: “Therefore let us leave the elementary teachings about Christ and go on to maturity, not laying again the foundation of repentance from acts that lead to death, and of faith in God, instruction about baptisms, the laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment. And God permitting, we will do so” (6:1-3). We are to love the Lord with all of our heart, soul, mind, and strength, bowing to the clear implications and imperatives of such a task.

This is not to suggest spiritual zeal for zeal’s sake, but to urge us all to take the goal and the way of growth seriously, for Christ has called. To those who bow before him, he has promised never to leave or forsake us, but to lead us in the life everlasting. Our faith is a Way. Let us now walk in it.

  • Stuart McAllister is vice president of training and special projects at Ravi Zacharias International Ministries in Atlanta, Georgia.

Don Carson on the Democracy

Posted in Uncategorized with tags on April 8, 2010 by Harry

At the beginning of the American experiment in democracy, the Founding Fathers adopted several stances, accepted by few today, that were deeply indebted to the Judeo-Christian heritage. This is not to say that the Founding Fathers were all Christians. Many weren’t; they were vague deists. But among these biblical assumptions was the belief that human beings are not naturally good and have potential for enormous evil.
For that reason, when the Fathers constructed their political system, they never appealed to “the wisdom of the American people” or similar slogans common today. Frankly, they were a little nervous about giving too much power to the masses. That is why there was no direct election of the president: there was an intervening “college.” Only (white) men with a stake in the country could vote. Even then, the branches of government were to be limited by a system of checks and balances, because for the Fathers, populist demagoguery was as frightening as absolute monarchy (as we saw in another connection on January 20).
Certainly one of the great advantages of almost any system of genuine democracy (genuine in this context presupposes a viable opposition, freedom of the press, and largely uncorrupted voting) is that it provides the masses with the power to turf out leaders who disillusion us. In that sense, democracy still works: government must be by the consent of the governed. Yet the primitive heritage has so dissipated today that politicians from all sides appeal to the wisdom of the people. Manipulated by the media, voting their pocketbooks, supporting sectional interests or monofocal issues, voters in America and other Western democracies do not show very great signs of transcendent wisdom. Worse, we labor under the delusion (indeed, we foster the delusion) that somehow things will be all right provided lots of people vote. Our system of government is our new Tower of Babel: it is supposed to make us impregnable. The Soviet empire totters; other nations crumble into the dust, Balkanized, destroyed by civil war, tribal genocide, grinding poverty, endemic corruption, Marxist or some other ideology. Not us. We belong to a democracy, “rule by the people.”
Not for a moment should we depreciate the relative good of living in a country with a relatively high level of income, a stable government, and some accountability. But such blessings do not guarantee righteousness. “The LORD reigns forever; he has established his throne for judgment. He will judge the world in righteousness; he will govern the peoples with justice” (Ps. 9:7–8).
Hear the voice of Scripture: “Arise, O LORD, let not man triumph; let the nations be judged in your presence. Strike them with terror, O LORD; let the nations know they are but men” (Ps. 9:19–20).

  • Carson, D. A. (1998). For the love of God : A daily companion for discovering the riches of God’s Word. Volume 1. Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway Books.

Come Thou Font of Every Blessing by Stuart Neill

Posted in Uncategorized on March 23, 2010 by Harry


Come Thou Fount of every blessing
Tune my heart to sing Thy grace;
Streams of mercy, never ceasing,
Call for songs of loudest praise
Teach me some melodious sonnet,
Sung by flaming tongues above.
Praise the mount! I’m fixed upon it,
Mount of God’s unchanging love.

Here I raise my Ebenezer;
Hither by Thy help I’m come;
And I hope, by Thy good pleasure,
Safely to arrive at home.
Jesus sought me when a stranger,
Wandering from the fold of God;
He, to rescue me from danger,
Interposed His precious blood.

O to grace how great a debtor
Daily I’m constrained to be!
Let that grace now like a fetter,
Bind my wandering heart to Thee.
Prone to wander, Lord, I feel it,
Prone to leave the God I love;
Here’s my heart, O take and seal it,
Seal it for Thy courts above.

Thankfulness Promotes a God-honoring Lifestyle

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , on March 3, 2010 by Harry

As an illustration of how thankfulness promotes a God-honoring lifestyle we may turn to the following quote from the pen of John Milton, the celebrated English poet: “Gratitude bestows reverence, allowing us to encounter everyday epiphanies, those transcendent moments of awe that change forever how we experience life and the world.”  If we thank God, we will revere Him, and such reverence will help us look at all of life as that which we are to live coram Deo – before the Lord’s face in a way that pleases Him, with no reason to be ashamed.

In Romans 1:18-32, Paul locates humanity’s most basic sin in our refusal as fallen creatures to honor God “or give thanks to Him.”  Lack of gratitude for all of God’s blessings is the first step toward idolatry, and the more we have the easier it can be to forget that all we have comes from the Lord’s hand.  Spend some time today thanking God for His blessings and always endeavor to acknowledge that your success is due ultimately to His kindness.

General Revelation – Mankind’s Guilty Knowledge of God

Posted in Romans, Uncategorized with tags on January 30, 2010 by Harry

All people are naturally inclined to some form of religion, yet they fail to worship their Creator, whose general revelation makes Him universally known. Sinful egoism and aversion to our Creator’s claims have driven humanity into idolatry, the error of giving worship and homage to any power or object other than God (Is. 44:9–20; Rom. 1:21–23; Col. 3:5).  In their idolatry, apostate humans “suppress the truth” and have “changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things” (Rom. 1:18, 23). They smother and quench, as far as they can, the awareness that general revelation provides of the transcendent Judge and Creator, and they transfer the ineradicable sense of deity to unworthy objects. This in turn leads to drastic moral decline and misery, as a first manifestation of God’s wrath against apostasy (Rom. 1:18, 24–32).
God will not allow human beings to suppress entirely their sense of God and of His judgment. Some sense of right and wrong, as well as of accountability to God, always remains. Even in the fallen world everyone is endowed with a conscience that from time to time condemns them, telling them that they ought to suffer for wrongs they have done. When conscience speaks in these terms it speaks with the voice of God.
In one sense, fallen humanity does not know God, since what people believe about the objects of their worship falsifies and distorts the truth about God. In another sense all human beings do know God, but in guilt, with uncomfortable inklings of the judgment they cannot avoid. Only the gospel of Christ can speak peace to this aspect of the human condition.

  • Whitlock, L. G., Sproul, R. C., Waltke, B. K., & Silva, M. (1995). Reformation study Bible, the : Bringing the light of the Reformation to Scripture : New King James Version. Nashville: T. Nelson.

Don Carson on Downward Drift

Posted in Uncategorized with tags on January 23, 2010 by Harry

One of the most striking evidences of sinful human nature lies in the universal propensity for downward drift. In other words, it takes thought, resolve, energy, and effort to bring about reform. In the grace of God, sometimes human beings display such virtues. But where such virtues are absent, the drift is invariably toward compromise, comfort, indiscipline, sliding disobedience, and decay that advances, sometimes at a crawl and sometimes at a gallop, across generations.
People do not drift toward holiness. Apart from grace-driven effort, people do not gravitate toward godliness, prayer, obedience to Scripture, faith, and delight in the Lord. We drift toward compromise and call it tolerance; we drift toward disobedience and call it freedom; we drift toward superstition and call it faith. We cherish the indiscipline of lost self-control and call it relaxation; we slouch toward prayerlessness and delude ourselves into thinking we have escaped legalism; we slide toward godlessness and convince ourselves we have been liberated.

Read more »

“all peoples on earth will be blessed through you”

Posted in Uncategorized with tags on January 11, 2010 by Harry

. . . Genesis 12, marks a turning point in God’s unfolding plan of redemption. From now on, the focus of God’s dealings is not scattered individuals, but a race, a nation. This is the turning point that makes the Old Testament documents so profoundly Jewish. And ultimately, out of this race come law, priests, wisdom, patterns of relationships between God and his covenant people, oracles, prophecies, laments, psalms—a rich array of institutions and texts that point forward, in ways that become increasingly clear, to a new covenant foretold by Israel’s prophets.
Even in this initial covenant with Abram, God includes a promise that already expands the horizons beyond Israel, a promise that repeatedly surfaces in the Bible. God tells Abraham, “All peoples on earth will be blessed through you” (12:3). Lest we miss its importance, the book of Genesis repeats it (18:18; 22:18; 26:4; 28:14). A millennium later, the same promise is refocused not on the nation as a whole, but on one of Israel’s great kings: “May his name endure forever; may it continue as long as the sun. All nations will be blessed through him, and they will call him blessed” (Ps. 72:17). The “evangelical prophet” often articulates the same breadth of vision (e.g., Isa. 19:23–25). The earliest preaching in the church, after the resurrection of Jesus, understood that the salvation Jesus had introduced was a fulfillment of this promise to Abraham (Acts 3:25). The apostle Paul makes the same connection (Gal. 3:8).
Even when the passage in Genesis is not explicitly cited, the same stance—that God’s ultimate intentions were from the beginning to bring men and women from every race into the new humanity he was forming—surfaces in a hundred ways. In fact, quite apart from this passage, two of the three remaining passages in today’s readings point in the same direction. In Matthew 11:20–24, Jesus makes it clear, in disturbing language, that on the last day pagan cities, though punished, may be punished less severely than the cities of Israel who enjoyed the unfathomable privilege of hearing Jesus for themselves, and seeing his miracles, but who made nothing of it. His own invitation is broad: “Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest” (Matt. 11:28). And in Acts 11, Peter recounts his experiences with Cornelius and his household to the church in Jerusalem, leading them to conclude, “So then, God has granted even the Gentiles repentance unto life” (Acts 11:18).
Christ receives the unrestrained praise of heaven, because with his blood he purchased people for God “from every tribe and language and people and nation” (Rev. 5:9; see meditation for December 15).

  • Carson, D. A. (1998). For the love of God : A daily companion for discovering the riches of God’s Word. Volume 1. Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway Books.

Tree of Life

Posted in Genesis, Uncategorized with tags , , on January 7, 2010 by Harry

GENESIS 2:1-16; 3:22-24 “Out of the ground the LORD God made to spring up every tree that is pleasant to the sight and good for food.  The tree of life was in the midst of the garden” (2:9).

  • Genesis 1-3 and its account of creation and the fall lays the foundation for the entire history of redemption, so we should not be surprised to see many of the themes introduced in these chapters recur again and again.
  • The Tree of Life introduced in 2:9 is one such theme that is developed throughout the Old Testament and fulfilled in the New.
  • Before we look at the Tree of Life in particular, we should note some of the ways the Bible understands trees in general.
    • Trees are often used in Scripture as symbols of life, particularly life that is considered full.
    • The fruitfulness of righteous people, for example, is likened to a tree filled with life (Prow. 11:30), and the fullness of life and honor is also associated with righteousness (21:21).
    • Moreover, the Old Testament also uses trees as metaphors for the life that God gives, especially since trees remain perpetually green in the arid climate of the Middle East and thus, in a certain sense, “eternally alive” (Jer. 17:7- 8).
  • Given these realities, it is easy to see why the Lord chose to supply life to His people by means of the Tree of Life while they lived in the garden of Eden (Gen. 2:9).
    • Apparently, immortality was the gift to anyone who regularly ate the fruit of the tree (3:22) and, as one commentator notes, the Tree of Life was also an early means of sacramental communication between God and His people.
    • The tree was a physical means of conducting a spiritual transaction, the very essence of a sacrament.
    • As long as Adam and Eve ate of the tree they had life, and they had access to the tree because before sin they were in a right relationship with God.
    • While they trusted His wisdom and obeyed His command not to eat of the forbidden fruit, our first parents could eat freely of the tree that gives life (2:16-17; 3:22-24).
    • Their trust in God’s promises, signified by their eating of the proper tree and not the forbidden fruit, maintained their place in Eden and consequently, their life of blessedness.
  • Of course, we know that Adam and Eve failed and they and their descendants were barred from eating the Tree of Life (3:24).
    • Cut off from the Lord’s presence and His life-giving tree, their deed plunged all of us into darkness and death, and all people have been trying since that day to find their way back to Eden. +
  • from Tabletalk Magazine, January 2010

Who Are You to Judge Others?

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , on January 6, 2010 by Harry

Hands down, Matthew 7:1 is the most frequently quoted Bible verse today: “Do not judge, so that you won’t be judged.” It’s been twisted to mean we can’t say someone’s action or lifestyle is wrong. However, when someone says, “Don’t judge,” he’s judging you for judging someone else. You’ve done wrong by saying someone else has done wrong! Clearly, we can’t escape making moral judgments. Furthermore, in the same context of the oft-quoted verse, Jesus made a moral judgment about certain persons, using metaphors about “dogs” and “pigs” (Mt 7:6), stressing that we shouldn’t continue to present God’s grace to those who persistently scoff and ridicule. At some point we must shake the dust off our feet and move on to the more receptive (Mt 10:14; Ac 13:51). On the other hand, Jesus commanded, “Stop judging according to outward appearances; rather judge according to righteous judgment” (Jn 7:24, emphasis added).
How do we resolve the apparent tension? By taking note of the spirit in which we make judgments. Do we think we’re superior (the attitude Jesus condemned), or are we assessing actions or attitudes with a spirit of humility and concern, recognizing our own weaknesses (1 Co 10:13; Gl 6:1)? In Matthew 7:5, Jesus told us first to examine ourselves (removing the log from our own eye), then we can help our brother or sister (taking the speck out of his or her eye). So there is a problem to be dealt with—but only after self-examination. The wrong kind of judging is condemning. The right kind of judging is properly evaluating moral (or doctrinal) matters with a humble, helpful attitude. (In 1 Co 5:5, “judging”—even excommunicating—is required in light of a church member’s shameless sexual misconduct.) We should treat others the way we would want to be treated (cp. Mt 7:12), thinking, There—but for the grace of God—go I.

So when discussing judging with others, first clarify what you mean by the word “judge.” This can serve as the context for clarifying right and wrong kinds of judgment. Further, we must take care to avoid the “Who am I to say So-and-So is wrong?” mentality. We can’t shrink from making moral judgments, nor can we escape them—lest we declare it wrong to say another is wrong.

  • by Paul Copan
    • Cabal, T., Brand, C. O., Clendenen, E. R., Copan, P., Moreland, J., & Powell, D. (2007). The Apologetics Study Bible: Real Questions, Straight Answers, Stronger Faith (1417). Nashville, TN: Holman Bible Publishers.

R.C. Sproul on 6 day Creation

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , on December 27, 2009 by Harry

Bible

Famous evangelical apologist changes his mind

  • RC Sproul says he is now a six-day, young-earth creationist.
  • For many years R.C.  Sproul publicly advocated a non-literal reading of the opening chapters of Genesis. But not any more.

Read more »

Assurance vs. Presumption

Posted in Uncategorized on October 11, 2009 by Harry

Island Falls, Maui, Hawaii_smaller“Assurance is having a confidence of eternal life which is rested upon the sure foundation of Jesus Chris, but presumption is presuming ourselves to have eternal life when, in fact, our confidence is based on nothing more than the flimsy foundation of our own self-righteousness.”

- Dr. McDowell Richards, president of Columbia Theological Seminary

C.S. Lewis on Doctrine

Posted in Uncategorized on August 31, 2009 by Harry

C.S. LewisFor my own part I tend to find the doctrinal books often more helpful in devotion than the devotional books, and I rather suspect that the same experience may await many others. I believe that many who find that “nothing happens” when they sit down, or kneel down, to a book of devotion, would find that the heart sings unbidden while they are working their way through a tough bit of theology with a pipe in their teeth and a pencil in their hand.

Attitude

Posted in Uncategorized with tags on August 15, 2009 by Harry

Charles Swindoll“The longer I live, the more I realize the impact of attitude on life. Attitude, to me, is more important than facts.

It is more important than the past, than education, than money, than circumstances, than failures, than successes, than what other people think or say or do. It is more important than appearance, giftedness, or skill. It will make or break a company … a church … a home.

The remarkable thing is we have a choice every day regarding the attitude we will embrace for that day. We cannot change the inevitable. The only thing we can do is play on the one string we have, and that is our attitude …

I am convinced that life is 10% what happens to me, and 90% how I react to it. And so it is with you … we are in charge of our Attitudes.”

- Charles Swindoll

Who Am I? by Casting Crowns

Posted in Uncategorized on August 9, 2009 by Harry


Read more »

Time Management

Posted in Uncategorized on July 30, 2009 by Harry

John CalvinThe Life God has given each of us is short, and it will  be measured in the heavenly rewards He has promised us.  We should therefore make the most of it that He might find us to be good and faithful servants.  Our goal is not to make ourselves busy with programs just for the sake of programs but to allocate our time wisely that we might serve our families and the people of God, and thus the Lord.  Do you manage your  time well in service to our Father?

  • From Tabletalk Magazine, July 29th entry

Deuteronomy 20 and OT Violence

Posted in Uncategorized on June 19, 2009 by Harry

New Bible CommentaryNew Bible Commentary:

  • The regulations for war in ch. 20 need to be used with great caution when principles are sought for the conduct of modern wars.
  • The first requirement is to distinguish holy war from other kinds, even in Israel.
  • Holy war is a concept which applies only, once and for all, to Israel’s occupation of its God-given land.
  • Even Israel’s wars in general are special, because at that period in the history of God’s dealing with humanity his people was also a nation, a political unit.
    • Now that that people is a church, which fights no wars as such, no nation has a mandate to suppose that God marches in its ranks in the wars that it fights – even where those wars may reasonably be thought just.
    • By the same token, Christian ‘just-war’ theory is right not to take this chapter as a mandate for fighting against impossible odds.
  • On the other hand, the principles of restraint, diplomacy, mercy and respect for noncombatants remain valid for all wars.
  • And any warfare which involves large-scale devastation of the creation itself should be repugnant, in view of vs 19-20.

Read more »

Ravi Zacharias on the Danger of Pluralization

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , on June 9, 2009 by Harry
  • From Let My People Think: “Secularization: Its Control and Power”
  • Pluralization: A competing number of worldviews available to our members and no one worldview is dominant
  • Pluralization does have some strengths
    • It compels the individual to take serious note of what he or she actually believes of eternal value and why he or she believes it
    • Pluralization in the world of cuisine is fantastic
    • It is wonderful to hear counter perspectives and be compelled to measure and evaluate your own – sometimes to the point of discomfort
  • The big qualifier is if plularization is extrapolated into meaning moral relativism – that’s when the danger signs begin

Spurgeon Morning and Evening June 9th a.m.

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , on June 9, 2009 by Harry

spurgeonTHE LORD HAS DONE GREAT THINGS FOR US; WE ARE GLAD.  – PSALM 126:3
Some Christians are sadly prone to look on the dark side of everything, and to dwell more upon what they have gone through than upon what God has done for them. Ask for their impression of the Christian life, and they will describe their continual conflicts, their deep afflictions, their sad adversities, and the sinfulness of their hearts, but with scarcely any reference to the mercy and help that God has provided them. But a Christian whose soul is in a healthy state will come forward joyously and say, “I will not speak about myself, but to the honor of my God. He has brought me up out of a horrible pit and out of the miry clay and set my feet upon a rock and established my goings; and He has put a new song in my mouth, even praise to our God. The Lord has done great things for me—I am glad.” This summary of experience is the very best that any child of God can present. It is true that we endure trials, but it is just as true that we are delivered out of them. It is true that we have our corruptions, and sadly we acknowledge this, but it is just as true that we have an all-sufficient Savior who overcomes these corruptions and delivers us from their dominion. In looking back, it would be wrong to deny that we have been in the Slough of Despond and have crept along the Valley of Humiliation, but it would be equally wicked to forget that we have been through them safely and profitably; we have not remained in them, thanks to our Almighty Helper and Leader, who has “brought us out to a place of abundance.”‘ The deeper our troubles, the louder our thanks to God, who has led us through them all and preserved us until today. Our griefs cannot spoil the melody of our praise; we consider them to be the “bass line” of our life’s song, “The LORD has done great things for us; we are glad.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.